Tommy says to me, I know a guy. With season tickets. Tommy says he can get two tickets. So there you go.
We had dinner at Wazee Supper Club where I had the all meat calzone and the amazeballs appetizer. Then it's time to head to the Can.
It's Celtic Appreciation day so there's bagpipes being played. Okay.
The announcer on the jumbotron tells us before the game that this is basically a playoff game. So there you go, free playoff tickets!
Here's our seats:
I've now sat in a few places in the Pepsi Center. These were probably my least favorite. But as a wide angle, you did get a chance to see the plays develop a lot more.
Within the first minute, the Avs turn the puck over and give up a great scoring chance. Varlamov made a great save. Throughout the first period, there were lots of turnovers by both teams, including some sloppy skating where players were falling seemingly off their own accord. Lots of scoring chances for both sides. I thought the Coyotes generally outplayed the Avs in the first, but Colorado had a 1-0 lead off a lucky bounce leading to a tip-in.
In the second period, toward the end of a power play, Johnson pokes at the puck in the neutral zone, getting it to Grigorenko. Who passes to Duchene, passes to Comeau, passes back to Duchene for the one-timer goal.
Good shit!
Arizona kept getting good chances but Varlamov was making great plays. 2-0 Avs through two.
In the third, Grigorenko makes a nifty play to get a rebound in the back of the net and it's 3-0 Avs with 14 to play. At this point, it feels like, oh man, the Avs got this one, it's not even a contest. Game over, blow out city.
And then the Coyotes score with 11 minutes left. 3-1.
And then about twenty seconds later they have another great scoring chance and I realize that if Arizona gets another one it's going to be very nerve-wracking, as Colorado has a reputation for giving up third-period leads. So basically the entire last 10 minutes were very tense and exciting, even though it had felt like a blowout earlier.
But they hung on for a 3-1 win. They put the puck in the empty net but after the buzzer.
This brings my personal attendance record to 5-3, with 5 x's on the hit list.
Wednesday, March 09, 2016
Tuesday, March 08, 2016
Monday, March 07, 2016
Lovie to Illinois
Illinois Football made front-page headlines on ESPN and other national media...and it was a good thing.
Last time that happened was probably the Rose Bowl berth, maybe Wes Lunt transferring. And after the entire scandal last year, firing Beckman, the two-year deal for Cubit, we needed some good news.
- - -
On November 28, 2015, Illinois football named interim coach Bill Cubit the official coach on a 2-year deal. Here's how the interim-AD spoke about it.
That's when the block I no longer stood for Illinois. It became Interim. Or not Ideal.
In December, USA Today graded the college football hires. Syracuse got a B+ for Dino Babers. Illinois got a F for Bill Cubit.
As you can imagine when your coach is on a two-year deal (that most people read between the lines as a one-year deal, since you never have a lame duck coach) recruits started decommitting. It was far from ideal.
Then Illinois hired Josh Whitman to be the AD. He saw that the Cubit deal was not only "not ideal," it was in fact a dagger in the heart of the program.
He started talking to Lovie Smith two weeks ago. His first day on the job he fired Cubit and two days later introduced Smith as our new head coach.
- - -
The highlight of Lovie Smith's coaching career is a consistently successful stint running the Chicago Bears. Their defense was always strong and sometimes to be feared. He got Rex Grossman to the Super Bowl. The year he was fired he went 10-6. In the three seasons since, the Bears have never had a winning record.
In Tampa Bay, he went from 2-14 to 6-10. I was surprised he was fired with that kind of improvement.
As a DC, he took the Rams defense from worst in the league in 2000 to appearing in the Super Bowl in 2001. (Went from giving up 29 a game to 17)
He's known for high ethical standards and for having his players love him. Two things that Illinois could really use right now.
Illinois, in particular the Chicago area is home to a large amount of talented high school football players that go virtually anywhere but Illinois. How many of them watched Lovie take the Bears to the Super Bowl? How many black high school students in Illinois would be more interested in talking to Lovie Smith than Bill Cubit?
No one expects him to arrive and for us to suddenly beat Ohio State. But if he can produce a consistent defense, Illinois will be in a lot more games.
USA Today gave Cubit a F.
I give Smith an A+.
Last time that happened was probably the Rose Bowl berth, maybe Wes Lunt transferring. And after the entire scandal last year, firing Beckman, the two-year deal for Cubit, we needed some good news.
- - -
On November 28, 2015, Illinois football named interim coach Bill Cubit the official coach on a 2-year deal. Here's how the interim-AD spoke about it.
#illini AD Paul Kowalczyk on 2-year deal: "It's not ideal but for now, I don't think it'll put a dagger in the heart of the program."— Jeremy Werner (@JWernerScout) November 28, 2015
That's when the block I no longer stood for Illinois. It became Interim. Or not Ideal.
In December, USA Today graded the college football hires. Syracuse got a B+ for Dino Babers. Illinois got a F for Bill Cubit.
As you can imagine when your coach is on a two-year deal (that most people read between the lines as a one-year deal, since you never have a lame duck coach) recruits started decommitting. It was far from ideal.
Then Illinois hired Josh Whitman to be the AD. He saw that the Cubit deal was not only "not ideal," it was in fact a dagger in the heart of the program.
He started talking to Lovie Smith two weeks ago. His first day on the job he fired Cubit and two days later introduced Smith as our new head coach.
- - -
The highlight of Lovie Smith's coaching career is a consistently successful stint running the Chicago Bears. Their defense was always strong and sometimes to be feared. He got Rex Grossman to the Super Bowl. The year he was fired he went 10-6. In the three seasons since, the Bears have never had a winning record.
In Tampa Bay, he went from 2-14 to 6-10. I was surprised he was fired with that kind of improvement.
As a DC, he took the Rams defense from worst in the league in 2000 to appearing in the Super Bowl in 2001. (Went from giving up 29 a game to 17)
He's known for high ethical standards and for having his players love him. Two things that Illinois could really use right now.
Illinois, in particular the Chicago area is home to a large amount of talented high school football players that go virtually anywhere but Illinois. How many of them watched Lovie take the Bears to the Super Bowl? How many black high school students in Illinois would be more interested in talking to Lovie Smith than Bill Cubit?
No one expects him to arrive and for us to suddenly beat Ohio State. But if he can produce a consistent defense, Illinois will be in a lot more games.
USA Today gave Cubit a F.
I give Smith an A+.
Sunday, March 06, 2016
Thursday, March 03, 2016
How I Predicted Best Picture
I was reading this article on FiveThirtyEight which tracks previous award shows as data points to forecast the Oscars.
It showed DiCaprio and Larson as prohibitive favorites, which of course was born out. It had Vikander as a decent favorite (she won) and Stallone as a slight favorite over Rylance (Rylance won).
As for Best Picture, he were was their rankings on February 5th:
I've captured the top four data points.
My reaction to these data points was to craft a theory. It was based on my personal history of observing which films win Best Picture. I call this The Inverse Awesome Theory.
In short, the more awesome a movie is, the less likely it is to win Best Picture.
It's important to note that awesomeness in this case is objective criteria, not a subjective assessment of quality. Awesomeness is what you find in summer blockbusters. Car chases and special effects and Tom Cruise dangling from wires. In other words, fun. If you go to the movies to have a fun time, and ranked them accordingly, the inverse is how likely it is to win Best Picture. You get the point.
I was able to eliminate Room, Brooklyn and Bridge of Spies solely on their position in the chart. The #5 ranked film was The Martian, a thoroughly fun film that felt more like a summer blockbuster than the trailer would lead you to believe. I knew this had no chance.
#4 was Mad Max: Fury Road, arguably the most awesome/fun movie released in 2015. There was no chance in hell this was going to win. I would have believed Room or Brooklyn had a better shot.
#3 was Spotlight. At the time I didn't know anything about it other than the title. I'll come back to this.
#2 was The Big Short. I saw the trailer and wanted to go see over it Christmas break, but didn't have time. Based on the trailer, it seemed pretty funny. It had Steve Carell in it. While not as awesome as Mad Max, it seemed like a fun time. I eliminated this from the possibility.
#1 was The Revenant. This had 2.29 points compared to 1.71 for Spotlight. I knew from the trailer that this seemed pretty artsy, based on the director and the cinematography. But I also knew that DiCaprio was attacked by a bear. That seemed pretty awesome. Again, I didn't know anything about Spotlight other than the title, but it seemed like The Revenant was more awesome because it had more bear attacks. So I posted that Spotlight would win Best Picture.
- - -
The next day I was telling our editor my theory and he tells me what Spotlight is about. And I immediately know I'm going to be right. A movie about journalism heroes exposing child molesters may be a quality film, but it is certainly not going to be awesome.
Monday, February 29, 2016
Saturday, February 27, 2016
Monday, February 22, 2016
The Worst 538 Article?
I love 538, but this was pretty terrible.
Here's where it all goes wrong:
"First, let’s check out his credentials. We want to know, essentially, how many good movies DiCaprio has made and how they stack up against the pre-Oscar résumés of those who have been honored with a top acting prize. We can do this by simply counting up films with high ratings on Rotten Tomatoes"
So the question is whether or not DiCaprio has been the Best Actor in any given year. That's obviously a subjective question. But if you wanted to try and analyze it with data, I suppose you could look at other acting awards besides the Academy Awards or maybe critics who mention best performance or something like that. Instead the author thinks that you can measure how good an actor is by how many good movies they've made. That's certainly a strange metric to base an entire article around.
By that logic, Robert Horry is the best basketball player of the last 50 years since he's won the most NBA Championships. Horry is a good player, but he's not that good. And most people would say that DeNiro is deserving of his 2 Academy Awards for acting, but he's made plenty of bad movies.
We're talking about acting, not directing. It's certainly possible to give a good performance in an otherwise not great film. Here are some of DiCaprio's movies that fell below the 75% rotten tomatoes bar:
Romeo & Juliet
Shutter Island
Revolutionary Road
Blood Diamond
The Great Gatsby
The Basketball Diaries
Meanwhile Jack Black has been in a bunch above the 75% mark including 3 Kung Fu Panda movies, School of Rock and Tropic Thunder. I love Jack Black as much as anyone, but I don't think anyone would look at those performances and say Jack Black out-acted DiCaprio because his movies had a higher rotten tomatoes rating.
What the author seems to miss is that DiCaprio is in the discussion for "best actor of his generation." When you Google that, you see DiCaprio mentioned along with Hoffman, Spacey and Washington. You click on a thread and you see DiCaprio, Bale, Norton.
If movie critics made a list of the top five current actors in Hollywood, DiCaprio would certainly be on the list, if not #1. So that's why people think he deserves an Oscar. Not because he's been a fair amount of good movies.
Here's where it all goes wrong:
"First, let’s check out his credentials. We want to know, essentially, how many good movies DiCaprio has made and how they stack up against the pre-Oscar résumés of those who have been honored with a top acting prize. We can do this by simply counting up films with high ratings on Rotten Tomatoes"
So the question is whether or not DiCaprio has been the Best Actor in any given year. That's obviously a subjective question. But if you wanted to try and analyze it with data, I suppose you could look at other acting awards besides the Academy Awards or maybe critics who mention best performance or something like that. Instead the author thinks that you can measure how good an actor is by how many good movies they've made. That's certainly a strange metric to base an entire article around.
By that logic, Robert Horry is the best basketball player of the last 50 years since he's won the most NBA Championships. Horry is a good player, but he's not that good. And most people would say that DeNiro is deserving of his 2 Academy Awards for acting, but he's made plenty of bad movies.
We're talking about acting, not directing. It's certainly possible to give a good performance in an otherwise not great film. Here are some of DiCaprio's movies that fell below the 75% rotten tomatoes bar:
Romeo & Juliet
Shutter Island
Revolutionary Road
Blood Diamond
The Great Gatsby
The Basketball Diaries
Meanwhile Jack Black has been in a bunch above the 75% mark including 3 Kung Fu Panda movies, School of Rock and Tropic Thunder. I love Jack Black as much as anyone, but I don't think anyone would look at those performances and say Jack Black out-acted DiCaprio because his movies had a higher rotten tomatoes rating.
What the author seems to miss is that DiCaprio is in the discussion for "best actor of his generation." When you Google that, you see DiCaprio mentioned along with Hoffman, Spacey and Washington. You click on a thread and you see DiCaprio, Bale, Norton.
If movie critics made a list of the top five current actors in Hollywood, DiCaprio would certainly be on the list, if not #1. So that's why people think he deserves an Oscar. Not because he's been a fair amount of good movies.
Friday, February 19, 2016
SF Recap
DAY ONE
Monday morning I arrived at Denver International Airport at sunrise.
I proceeded to fly over the Rocky Mountains.
And landed in San Francisco, where I went straight to La Taqueria to meet Niraj and get a burrito. La Taqueria won 538's burrito bracket and I was curious because I've always wanted to try a griddled burrito (you have to order Dorado style to get it griddled.)
I ordered the Super (adds avocado, sour cream and cheese) Carnitas burrito Dorado style with no beans.
The burrito was quite impressive. The griddled tortilla makes a huge difference and I wonder why every place doesn't offer the option. The meat wasn't as flavorful as I might have expected, but overall this was an outstanding burrito. I also opted try their Agua Fresca. (When in Rome) They had a bunch of flavors, I picked Tangerine. It tasted just like clementines, which I love.
From there we walked to Dolores Park and made some game plans.
After that we headed to Golden Gate Park to play 18 holes of frisbee golf.
Burnsdog crushed me. He was up 5 holes through 7.

But I did hit the best shot of my life. You can see my green disc in the basket above. I stupidly had already moved from where I took the shot for this picture, the shot was farther back and on the left. I'd say it was at least 50 feet out.
From there we went to Magnolia Pub & Brewery on Haight St.
I got the Proving Ground IPA, Devils on Horseback on Brussels Sprouts, and cheddar bacon burger. When they brought out the devils on horseback (bacon-wrapped dates) I commented that the Brussels sprouts were a waste. (I mean I like them, but they are no bacon-wrapped dates.) And then they turned out to be the best Brussels sprouts I've ever had.
From there we checked out the last night that Amsterdam (a bar) was open. But I was so tired, I didn't last long.
DAY TWO
We started the day by walking to Alamo Square.
From there we tried to go to House of Thai 2 but they weren't open yet, so we went across the street to Kate's Kitchen. I got the spicy chicken on baguette with their home fries. Delicious.
After lunch we bussed it over to Anchor Brewing for a 1pm tour. They're nice enough to give you a decent sample of Anchor Steam before the tour starts. And then after the tour, they give you 6 other Anchor samples.
After the tour we Ubered over to an Escape Room. 60 minutes to get out of a locked room. To read my full recap, go here.
After that we headed to The Social Study where I tried some Sanfrangria. Since the Escape Room was in Japantown, we were inspired to have sushi for dinner. We went to Hot Zushi and it was great although I didn't take any pictures.
DAY THREE
Here's the view out Niraj's window. Not too shabby.
A brief backstory. In December I got an email that a bar near me would be tapping Pliny the Elder. I show up an hour and a half after they open and it's already gone. So Niraj and I head to Monk's Kettle for lunch and I order a Pliny the Elder like it's nothing special.
Couldn't decide between the burger and the chicken sandwich so we get one of each and split one. Both are really amazing and the fries come with outstanding tomato jam.
Then we hop in a ZipCar and drive north to Petaluma. Home of Lagunitas Brewing.
Great stuff. In fact, I gave Aunt Sally's Sour my highest rating to date.
Here's the bathroom at Lagunitas:
After Lagunitas, it's just a short drive to Santa Rosa, home of Russian River Brewing. I really wanted to get a flight to try all their beers. But the week I was here happened to be the once a year release of Pliny the Younger, one of the most sought after craft beers. People have waited 8 hours in line for this beer. I wanted to try it too but didn't want to wait a super long time. So we show up and it doesn't look that bad.
Still in line.
Took us just over 2 hours to get inside.
After all that we we get a glass of Younger. And...to me it's hardly different than Elder. For some people waiting all that time might build it up so that they think it's something more than it really is. I think it had the opposite effect for me. Like, I waited this long for a beer that tastes like a beer?
The star of the show really is:
That's a 21-beer flight. 18 fit in their custom holder and three more served on the side. Most were good, some were outstanding.
And on the way home we pulled of at a viewpoint for a dramatic shot:
Simply put, another fantastic trip.
SF Escape Room
Niraj and I went to an Escape Room. 60 minutes to solve all the puzzles needed to get out of a locked room.
We escaped with 13 seconds left! A nail-biting time of 59:47.
In other words it took us 99.64% of our possible time to escape.
I love the whole thing. Genuinely thrilling.
So going into it, we see that this room has a 12% success rate. That's fairly daunting.
We had 11 people, including one family of 7 and a couple that showed up late.
This room was much larger than the ones I had done in Denver. There they had a max of 8 and we escaped one with just 5 of us. We all go in and watch a cheesy short video from the character behind this escape room. Honestly, when we walked into this one it looked like there was nothing to do. In previous rooms there were 5 or 6 various types of locks. And my strategy for Niraj was study the locks first so you know what types of answers you're looking for. Well, here they were no locks. So much for that. I start searching through a cabinet and I find a clock.
As it turns out there were 8 puzzles that we had all the information to solve that in the end revealed one answer. And there was one puzzle that we couldn't solve yet, but we didn't know that. It happened to be the one that Niraj spent the most time on.
But the rest of the 8 varied immensely in type and time required. They were labeled A through G. A was a giant crossword on the floor with 15 clues scattered throughout the room. Some we only found after we assembled the whole thing. The clues were simple but assembling it was a different matter. I worked on it and got lucky that everything that I guessed at where it might go, turned out to be right. And then I saw the answer written diagonally well before we realized there was an arrow showing us where to start reading the answer. This one took at least 10 minutes and we had multiple people working on it at various points. I mistakenly thought "Louisiana marsh" was going to be "bog" and was stuck when there was no g. We were looking for "bayou."
Me and a kid worked on B and it only took 1 minute once had all the clocks to put them in the outlines on wall and read their hands.
C involved standing with hands and feet against a wall in marked spots to spell out letters. I didn't work on this one at all.
D was a pattern puzzle written on the wall that looked impossible to me but someone else eventually solved it.
E involved finding a word in a book. I don't think it was too hard but didn't touch it.
F was a complicated one. You had to assemble a maze puzzle made of bins, then figure out which ones the maze route didn't go through, then convert the numbered answer into letters using codes hidden around the room. Of course when you walk in and see 3 = w, you don't even know what to do with that. Didn't work on this one either.
G...I don't remember at all.
H was a literal 50-piece puzzle that you had to put together first. The kids took 20 minutes just to put this together. Then it revealed a math equation that wasn't easy and then convert that to letters as well.
So these A through H all lead to one answer. We had it figured out about halfway though but it didn't make sense. And then once we finally got the complete answer about 35 minutes in, it still didn't make sense. We had 11 puzzle-solving people in the room and no one could figure it out. About five minutes go by and the room people finally give us our first hint. 20 seconds letter I flipped one thing over and it was super easy. That ended Phase One.
The room people gave us a new card that involved the puzzle Niraj had spent so much time on. Now we had everything we needed and Niraj knew where everything went so it went quick. I shouted "Hit the Lights" a good two minutes before we needed to. Once we had everything in place, I shouted out the answer that ended Phase Two.
This opened a brand new area of the room. We had about 10-15 minutes left at this point I think. Yikes. We finally see our first lock, with four letters needed to solve it. We start looking for letters. All of a sudden people find three of them. I accidentally pull something apart and say whoops. And start putting it back on. A room guy comes over and says to me, "Sir you need to be careful with those supplies, they are very fragile." I immediately apologize out of habit and then two seconds later process that it's a hint and start pulling them all apart. Niraj comes over and finds the letter in a piece I had pulled apart but left behind. That was the missing part to solve the lock and Phase Three.
That revealed a question that was a callback to the video that we watched when we entered the room. I had absolutely no idea. Thank goodness for kids who paid close attention. One of them knew the answer right away. This revealed the final puzzle.
We only had about 1 minute left at this point. We had to assemble an arrow. It took a little bit to figure it out. The arrow pointed to the key that opens the door. We got the key give it to a kid who runs over to the lock. And...
In other words it took us 99.64% of our possible time to escape.
I love the whole thing. Genuinely thrilling.
Wednesday, February 10, 2016
Derren Brown!
I'm surprised that I haven't written about Derren Brown before. He's a mentalist/magician/etc and I find him and his shows fascinating. I probably discovered him around 2009 and every couple of years I remember him and go watch everything I can on youtube. This is probably the fourth time this has happened.
On youtube you can find a variety of shows.
He has somewhat traditional magic type stage shows. I've watched Something Wicked This Way Comes, An Evening of Wonders, Enigma, Infamous and Svengali. I've yet to see Derren Brown Live. Here are two of my favorites:
He also has a bunch of edited one-hour TV specials and series. I've seen The Great Art Robbery, The System, The Events, all four of The Experiments, Pushed To The Edge, The Heist, some episodes of Trick of the Mind and Trick or Treat.
What's interesting about this is he gives you one explanation for how he did it. Or was he just able to use sleight of hand and forge the signature. I don't know.
And there's just a slew of great clips that are pulled from a variety of shows.
Pickpocketing
Paying With Paper
Card Trick
Choosing The Right Door
I've seriously looked at buying tickets to a show in the UK. I'm all in.
On youtube you can find a variety of shows.
He has somewhat traditional magic type stage shows. I've watched Something Wicked This Way Comes, An Evening of Wonders, Enigma, Infamous and Svengali. I've yet to see Derren Brown Live. Here are two of my favorites:
"An Evening of Wonders"
"Svengali"
He also has a bunch of edited one-hour TV specials and series. I've seen The Great Art Robbery, The System, The Events, all four of The Experiments, Pushed To The Edge, The Heist, some episodes of Trick of the Mind and Trick or Treat.
Trick of the Mind: Season 2, Episode 1 featuring Simon Pegg
What's interesting about this is he gives you one explanation for how he did it. Or was he just able to use sleight of hand and forge the signature. I don't know.
And there's just a slew of great clips that are pulled from a variety of shows.
Pickpocketing
Paying With Paper
Card Trick
Choosing The Right Door
I've seriously looked at buying tickets to a show in the UK. I'm all in.
Friday, February 05, 2016
Wednesday, February 03, 2016
Point / Counterpoint: Rooting for the Broncos in the Super Bowl
Point:
It makes sense to root against the Broncos in the regular season. The Chiefs are directly competing against them for a playoff spot. And as happened this year, if the Broncos had lost more games, the Chiefs would have had won the division, had a higher seed and a home playoff game.
But once the Chiefs are out of it, how the Broncos perform doesn't affect my team. It seems kind of petty to keep rooting against them if it doesn't help my team. I have friends who are Broncos fans. I love the city of Denver. Peyton Manning is a great quarterback and it would be a great story to have him win his last game in Super Bowl 50.
Counterpoint:
FUCK THE BRONCOS. I hope the Manning era is a complete disappointment for this franchise. I want them to get blown the fuck out and have Peyton retire and then the Broncos go 5-11 for the next 20 years. I embrace the pettiness. Everywhere I look, I'm surrounded by jerseys and logos of a team I hate. The Broncos already have the most Super Bowl losses in history. Just add another one onto the pile. Let that be their legacy. Last time the Seahawks beat them by 35. Let's see if the Panthers can do 36. Fuck the Broncos.
It makes sense to root against the Broncos in the regular season. The Chiefs are directly competing against them for a playoff spot. And as happened this year, if the Broncos had lost more games, the Chiefs would have had won the division, had a higher seed and a home playoff game.
But once the Chiefs are out of it, how the Broncos perform doesn't affect my team. It seems kind of petty to keep rooting against them if it doesn't help my team. I have friends who are Broncos fans. I love the city of Denver. Peyton Manning is a great quarterback and it would be a great story to have him win his last game in Super Bowl 50.
Counterpoint:
FUCK THE BRONCOS. I hope the Manning era is a complete disappointment for this franchise. I want them to get blown the fuck out and have Peyton retire and then the Broncos go 5-11 for the next 20 years. I embrace the pettiness. Everywhere I look, I'm surrounded by jerseys and logos of a team I hate. The Broncos already have the most Super Bowl losses in history. Just add another one onto the pile. Let that be their legacy. Last time the Seahawks beat them by 35. Let's see if the Panthers can do 36. Fuck the Broncos.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




































